Posted on February 27, 2010 by David Cuillier
Mark Weiler, a doctoral candidate at Simon Fraser University, sent us an e-mail the other day asking why public records requests are called “requests.” Why do we refer to “requesters”? That’s a great point!
After all, when we go to a library to pick up a book that we are entitled to, we wouldn’t “request” the book. We wouldn’t ask a librarian, “May I please check out this book?” and then await an answer. We talk about checking out books, or “taking” them from the library, because we all assume that our taxes paid for the books and they are public for anyone to check out. So if public records are paid for and are legally disclosable, why do we have to “request” them? Certainly, some records are not disclosable for necessary reasons (national security, privacy, etc.), but that does not change the nature of acquiring records. Calling them “requests” is polite, but it also implies the idea of citizen submission to the government, but isn’t our government accountable to the people? Aren’t the people in charge?
So what’s a better term? FOI order? FOI directive? Should we refer to “patrons” instead of “requesters”? I like the sound of, “the citizen submitted a records order to the school district for expenses related to the new high school construction,” better than, “the citizen submitted a records request to the school district asking for expenses related to the new high school construction.” Any thoughts or suggestions on wording?
Filed under: 2. Doc state of mind, 5. Request strategies | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 26, 2010 by Charles N. Davis
In Oklahoma, where the legislature has been considering a really bad bill aimed at closing all identifying information of state employees, came news that the leader of the Senate said he would vote against a bill to keep public employees’ birth dates confidential if the measure returns to the Senate.
The best line of the story is Sen. Coffee’s quote:
“Upon further review, I think I would have changed my vote,” Coffee said. “I think you have to have access to that information and the First Amendment matters, like all of the Constitution. We need to preciously guard that. Are there abuses? Sure. Does that mean you don’t protect the First Amendment and what it stands for? No, I don’t think so.”
Now THAT is music to my ears! Wow!
Filed under: 2. Doc state of mind | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 25, 2010 by David Cuillier
The Investigative News Network released its first major project, on the lack of punishment by universities against rapists, based on an incredible amount of records gathering, interviews and surveys. They even explain how you can do the same reporting at your local university.
The year-long project, conducted by seven different state and regional investigative reporting groups, revealed a culture of indifference and lack of punishment for sexual assaults, sometimes leading to repeat offenders. The project also exposed a system shrouded in secrecy and under-reporting crime statistics to the public.
What I love about this project, other than the awesome reporting and writing, is a special Web page set up to help others do the same reporting. The Reporter’s Toolkit lays out the law, how to investigate the cases, and provides a long list of resources. Outstanding!
Also, this report shows, once again, that universities rarely report accurate crime statistics (see, for example, a project in 2004 that showed how universities in the Pacific Northwest under-reported crime stats, despite federal law (Clery Act) requiring they tell the public what is going on). It goes to show that you can’t trust everything in a public record – numbers are sometimes twisted to make agencies look better. That’s why it is important to triangulate – look at other places that might have similar records, interview people, and find out what’s really going on.
Filed under: 1. Records that matter, 2. Doc state of mind, 9. FOI writing & ethics | Tagged: Education, Public safety | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 25, 2010 by artofaccessdudes
In which yours truly cusses in his quote. How embarrassing! Oh well, I got the point across. – Charles
Filed under: 1. Records that matter | Tagged: Politics | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 25, 2010 by artofaccessdudes
Kid gets into fight in middle school right here in Columbia, Mo. Mom asks whether there is a surveillance camera. School says “yes, but you can’t watch it…” and a Sunshine scrap ensues. Why can’t she see it?
Filed under: 1. Records that matter | Tagged: Education, Local gov | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 24, 2010 by artofaccessdudes
In the annals of secrecy masked as “privacy” comes this story, in which hunters in Idaho seek to keep hunting and fishing licenses under wraps. A license is a public act, people.
Filed under: 3. Access law | Tagged: Sports | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 24, 2010 by David Cuillier
State officials around the country are trying to figure out how to handle public officials’ discussions via Twitter, Facebook, texting and other electronic devices. If officials are discussing public business then those messages are public records.
Check with your government jurisdictions to find out whether they are recording Blackberry messages and other electronic communications. If they aren’t, then they should. A good starting point is to ask for e-mail messages of the major executives, such as the city manager or mayor. Then when you get to know the computer technicians and they start getting used to you, ask about other officials’ communications. Do they use a Blackberry or text on a cell phone? Ask for those communications (e.g., the incredible coverage by the Detroit Free Press based on text message records that sent the mayor to prison). Then move from there. Do they Twitter? Discuss issues on Facebook? Make sure that the public’s business is conducted in public.
Filed under: 4. Finding records, 5. Request strategies, 7. Electronic records | Tagged: Local gov | Leave a comment »