Here is a textbook example of why sometimes secrecy seems like the right thing, when in fact it is precisely the wrong thing…
A bill that would shield certain bed bug data from public records law in an effort to encourage voluntary reporting passed in the House this morning.
House Bill 2131, which now heads to the Senate, passed on a 55-1 vote.
Rep. Bill Kennemer, R-Oregon City, said that bed bug infestations are a growing health concern in Oregon.
“Here’s the bill that you have been itching to vote on,” Kennemer told lawmakers on the House floor.
Under the bill, bed bug infestations reported by pest control operators to a public health authority would be kept confidential. The location of the infestation, identity of the property owner and information describing the infestation would be exempt from public records law.
Public health officials say that it would encourage voluntary reporting for data that is currently difficult to gather.
Pest control operators are not required to report bed bug infestations. If the information was released to the public, it could jeopardize the operator’s business with clients, supporters say.
“Collecting this new data allows public health (officials) to make data-driven decisions about prioritization of scarce resources for bed bug education, mitigation and assistance,” Kennemer said.
So, to translate: we have a public health concern. It could cause very real shame to those who have an infestation…so, if we keep this information from the public, it will incentivize those in arrears to clean up their act.
Nothing — absolutely nothing – supports that assumption. Logic defies it. And yet it emerges over and over in FOI issues: “hide it, and it will get better…” I am itching just thinking about it.
- Bedbug infestation secrecy bill passes Oregon House (oregonlive.com)
- Bedbugs in Oregon don’t need more darkness, secrecy (oregonlive.com)